Why venture capitalist believes Holmes should be freed


After 30-plus years in venture capital and seeding  companies like Skype, Baidu, Robinhood, Tesla, SpaceX, Hotmail, and many others that were not so successful, I believe it is incumbent on me to do the diligence on any startup I back. If a company doesn’t work out, I take my lumps and move on. Startups by their nature are risky. Investors know these risks when we write their checks.

Entrepreneurs, by their nature, are projecting a future that they want to accomplish and as my partner used to say: The best entrepreneurs have a reality distortion field because they often believe that they have accomplished what they have set out to accomplish because they have done so in their minds.

When I first met Elizabeth Holmes, she was 19 years old and told me she wanted to “change health care as we know it.” I could see how passionate she was. She is determined about what she feels is unconscionable: the system of health care in our country is expensive, unfair and provides inadequate service, and it can be so much better with new technologies she was attempting to build.

We knew Theranos was a long shot when we backed it. It was an ambitious project of incredibly advanced biochemistry and technological machinery that had never been conceived of, let alone built, and it was trying to wedge into an entrenched, customer-controlling industry. But we took a purposeful, calculated risk with our investment and while Theranos failed, I do not regret my investment.

Although they have remained silent with respect to Elizabeth and Theranos, venture capitalists have a very different attitude than what the media or the courts have to date espoused. We VCs know the risks. We know that entrepreneurs have a reality distortion field, and that is what makes them so critical to our world. It is hard to imagine a life without a smartphone, without a car, without indoor plumbing, without electricity. It was entrepreneurs like Elizabeth who gave them to us.

The public (and possibly the courts) has been heavily influenced by what they have read about Elizabeth in the media and the various books and movies about her.  They have turned her into a villainous caricature. This is just wrong. She is heroic for her efforts, for all the challenges she has faced and pitfalls she has overcome to bring this technology to us to change our world. It is not our proudest moment as a country when we take down one who has tried to do so much for us.

Read original article here

Denial of responsibility! Yours Bulletin is an automatic aggregator of the all world’s media. In each content, the hyperlink to the primary source is specified. All trademarks belong to their rightful owners, all materials to their authors. If you are the owner of the content and do not want us to publish your materials, please contact us by email – [email protected]. The content will be deleted within 24 hours.

Leave A Reply

Your email address will not be published.