Colorado lawmakers consider plan for state oversight of county jails

The Colorado Attorney General’s Office soon may have the ability to inspect and investigate complaints against county jails under pending legislation that would give a state agency oversight of local detention facilities here for the first time.

In a bill set to be presented to legislators in coming weeks, the attorney general’s office would participate in regular jail audits alongside a separate group of inspectors working with the County Sheriffs of Colorado, a nonprofit organization. Officials from the office could also receive complaints, release their own reports about jails’ conditions and launch investigations into any concerning and consistent practices identified in the facilities.

The plan strengthens a compromise considered by legislators as they prepare to approve statewide jail standards for the first time in the state’s history. As those standards have neared completion, the Jail Standards Commission found no state agency was willing to ensure the standards were followed by sheriffs, nearly all of whom are elected in Colorado.

With state agencies out, legislators and the commission settled on empowering a group of peer inspectors — essentially other jail and sheriff personnel, plus outside experts — to conduct regular audits on each other, without the ability to levy penalties.

The Denver Post reported on concerns about the oversight plan last month. While the peer-review model is used in four other states, it sparked concerns among advocates and some lawmakers who worried about sheriffs policing themselves and raised questions about how the state could ensure a resistant jail was brought into compliance.

One national expert told The Post that sheriffs auditing each other was her “least favorite” form of jail oversight.

Rep. Judy Amabile, a Boulder Democrat who’s helped lead the jail oversight work, said the attorney general’s office called her last month and agreed to participate in inspections alongside the peer auditing teams.

The office will attend the peer group’s regular jail audits and can release its own reports if its findings differ from those of the peer audit groups. Amabile said the peer auditing framework initially considered by legislators helped lay the groundwork for the state office to feel comfortable getting involved.

Lawrence Pacheco, a spokesman for Attorney General Phil Weiser, said in an email that the office had “consistently told legislators that the attorney general’s legal authority to bring investigations for patterns and practices of civil rights violations would cover the type of conduct being discussed and could be used as an enforcement mechanism for jail oversight.”

Pacheco said the office was working with legislators “to state this even more specifically in state law.”

Read original article here

Denial of responsibility! Yours Bulletin is an automatic aggregator of the all world’s media. In each content, the hyperlink to the primary source is specified. All trademarks belong to their rightful owners, all materials to their authors. If you are the owner of the content and do not want us to publish your materials, please contact us by email – admin@yoursbulletin.com. The content will be deleted within 24 hours.

Leave a Comment