Lancaster man gets life in prison without parole for killing his 4 kids, their grandma – Daily News

By TERRI VERMEULEN KEITH

A Lancaster man was sentenced to life in prison Wednesday without the possibility of parole for the shooting deaths of his four young children and their grandmother as she was babysitting them.

Germarcus Lamar David, 32, was convicted last month of five counts of first-degree murder for the Nov. 28, 2021, killings of his 11-year-old daughter, Namiyah, and his three sons, Germarcus Jr., 7, Kayden, 2, and Noah, 1, along with his mother-in-law, Ericka England, 51, who was babysitting the children while their mother was having dinner with friends.

The Lancaster jury also found true the special circumstance allegation of multiple murders, along with finding David guilty of three counts of assault on a child causing death involving his three youngest children.

THE TRIAL: Lancaster man convicted of murdering his 4 kids, their grandmother

Deputy District Attorney Vanessa Zuniga had urged jurors to convict David of the most serious charges of first-degree murder, while defense attorney Anna Brief called on the panel to find the lesser option of second-degree murder for a man whom she said did the “unimaginable.”

In her closing argument, the prosecutor told jurors that “each of the victims were shot multiple times.”

The deputy district attorney told the panel to “hold him responsible for what he did,” noting that the prosecution’s theory is that David was upset that his estranged wife was moving on with her life after seeking a divorce upon learning of his extramarital relationship in which he fathered a child.

“He still wanted to be with her,” Zuniga said, telling jurors that he wanted to make his estranged wife feel the way he felt when she “finally said no.”

The prosecutor said David called his estranged wife twice as he sat in the driveway after returning home early from his job as a security guard and fired 20 shots — with each shot hitting one of his targets — about seven minutes after he entered the family’s home.

She noted that the shots can be heard on surveillance video from outside the house, with eight initial shots and another nine gunshots 12 seconds later and three louder gunshots starting about two minutes later.

Zuniga — who showed the jury graphic photos of the victims’ injuries — said some of the victims were shot with both a gun and a shotgun, and called the killings “willful, deliberate and premeditated.”

“He knows what he did,” the deputy district attorney said, telling jurors that he “did it to get back” at his estranged wife. “He’s finished off those that she loved.”

The defendant tossed the gun in a desert area after driving away and then went to a Los Angeles County sheriff’s station, where he asked a deputy to detain him and said, “It was a murder,” Zuniga told the jury.

David’s attorney told jurors the case was “a homicide,” and that identification is “not an issue in this case.”

The defense lawyer urged the panel to find him guilty of second-degree murder instead of the more serious offense of first-degree murder.

Brief told jurors that the jealousy was already stewing in her client’s head when he heard the children’s mother on a phone call catching up with a male friend two days before the killings and that his brain was trying to process that his marriage was dissolving.

David’s lawyer said the desperation was building when he found out she was going out to dinner with friends the night of the killing, with the defendant knowing that “his marriage was literally on the brink.”

David “didn’t want this marriage to end” and wanted to talk things out with his estranged wife but had difficulty reaching her in phone calls, according to his attorney.

“He shot everyone, but his brain is still in pause,” Brief told the jury, noting that his estranged wife responded that she had already told him their marriage was over when he subsequently called her again to ask if they were “really done.”

The defense attorney said David was “still processing what he just did” after going to the sheriff’s station, saying that it went to the question of premeditation and deliberation.

“Based upon his actions, you can’t say that,” she said. “He was in such an emotional state.”

David’s attorney said his client “can’t answer” when initially asked by a deputy why he thought he should be detained, saying that he was having “trouble processing.”

“He can’t answer. … He had just done the unimaginable,” she said.